Yes we did. And as SickOfLibs said, someone had to agree to this. Either the Romney team or the RNC agreed to this, perhaps both.
Do you think the Democrats would have agreed to four FoxNews talking heads? Why does our team agree to it in reverse?

My tolerance for knee-jerk off-the-cuff victim-theme defenses for Rs expired about 2007.

Well that's good to know.  Now, what does that have to do with the comments I made?  I am taking the Romney team and or the RNC to task for agreeing to these moderators.  How is that knee-jerk, off-the-cuff, or a victim-theme defense of anyone?  It is actually a fairly reasoned act of assessing blame and placing it squarely where it belongs, for an entirely reasonable issue of concern.

Back when the 47% vid came out Rush was praising the comment and many here followed, then Romney told Hannity it was ‘totally wrong’ and I heard Rush last week say that Romney talking about 47% at all is risky because it can be effectively used against him, used to accuse Romney of wanting to raise taxes on them.

Okay great.  Now, what does that have to do with my comments.  Did I praise someone and then take them to task on the same subject?  After doing this, did I explain how it could be used against them?  Why use this example.  It has nothing to do with my comments.

If you ever watched A+E Intervention you will see parents crying and hand wringing over their addict kids, very dramatic, and then you see many of them give their addict kids money to buy more crack or meth claiming they have to to ‘keep them out of jail’. It's called co-dependency.

What possible connection to my comments does this have?  How is it an act of co-dependency to take Romney and or the RNC to task for agreeing to this lopsided moderator situation?  What did I say above, that equates with wringing my hands and giving an adict money to get more drugs?

I am no longer a co-dependent of Republican victim syndrome. They need to grow some....

You could probably be co-dependent with a Republican.  You could be co-dependent with a victim.  You can't be co-dependent with a syndrome.

And as for needing to grow some, well... rather strange.  In fact this whole response was a waste of time.  Why make it?

If you've got a case to be made about it being wrong to want Obama not to win the election, then make it.  If you think it's co-dependance to urge folks to go in Romney's direction rather than Obama's then make it.

There's no real need to be this obtuse and border-line offensive.

The issue is, was it a good idea for the Romney team and or the RNC to agree to these moderators?  If you don't have an opinion that you can make without fun and games off topic, why not take a pass on responding.